Skip to content
Innovativity

System Integrators build what you ask for. I make sure you are asking for the right thing.

Independent quality assurance on the Finance design of your S/4HANA program, for CFOs and program managers. Before build, during build, and at the first close. With or without a System Integrator.

15 minutes, instant result, no sales call attached.

Ugur Hasdemir, independent SAP S/4HANA Finance architect
15+

years in SAP Finance

11

S/4HANA programs

SAP Press

SAP Press author

8

QA seats maximum

Clients I have worked with

  • Unilever
  • Air France KLM
  • Cargill
  • LeasePlan
  • NXP
  • Nedspice
  • Royal Boon Edam
  • BBA Pumps
  • Geesink Norba
  • Asia Express Food
  • ICKX
  • Van Tol
  • Merrem
  • Provimi

Who I work with

CFOs and finance leadership

You sign off on the numbers after go-live. I make sure the design behind them is right, and I put my opinion in writing so there is a paper trail behind every key decision.

Program and transformation managers

You own the timeline and the risk register. Design questions get an answer within one business day, so decisions do not sit open for weeks and flaws surface before build.

Finance teams on a live system

Live on S/4HANA or ECC, no System Integrator on site, and a backlog of design debt. A senior architect on call, without hiring one.

How I work with you

Most clients start with the free assessment, hire me once for a design review, and keep me on for the rest of the program.

Free Finance Readiness Assessment

Score your Finance design across five areas in about 15 minutes. Instant result with ranked risks.

Start the assessment

Finance Design Review

One independent review of your blueprint before build. Risk-ranked findings and a clear go or fix list.

About the review

Quality Assurance

A standing seat next to your program. Every design question answered within one business day, a monthly QA session, and my written opinion behind every key decision.

How a seat works

Specialist Resourcing

Need people rather than a verdict? I place senior SAP consultants I have vetted myself, Finance and the modules around it. They work to the same design standards I audit against.

Specialist Resourcing

What I check

The parts of the Finance design where programs lose data integrity and only find out at the first close. Most of those postings are not made by Finance. They come from logistics, sales, procurement, production and projects, and most Finance teams only review their own corner. I check the whole value flow.

Enterprise structure and chart of accounts

The frame everything else hangs on: company codes, plants, sales and purchasing organisations on the logistics side; controlling area, operating concern, profit centers, segments and functional areas on the Finance side; and one chart of accounts that serves group reporting and local statutory needs. Get this wrong and every later fix is a migration.

What I check

  • Company code, plant, controlling area and operating concern assignments against the legal and the management structure
  • One operational chart of accounts, with group and country charts where local GAAP needs them, account groups, and the account types for primary and secondary costs
  • Profit center and segment design that follows how the business is steered, not the material master
  • Functional areas for cost of sales reporting and the dimensions every planned report needs
Finance integration with logistics, sales, procurement, production and projects

Most postings in the Universal Journal are created by goods movements, invoices, deliveries, confirmations and settlements in MM, SD, PP, PS and PM/CS, not by Finance. Programs leave this to the logistics workstreams and find out at the first close that inventory, cost of sales and the P&L do not agree. This is where I spend most of my review time.

What I check

  • Account determination for goods movements, invoice verification and billing, valuation classes, price control per material type, and GR/IR clearing
  • Procure to pay: purchase order account assignment, invoice variances, accruals, and consignment and subcontracting flows
  • Order to cash: pricing conditions to revenue and deduction accounts, event-based revenue recognition for sales orders, projects and services, and the cost of goods sold split
  • Production, plant maintenance and projects: order types, work in process, variance categories, results analysis and settlement rules for production, PM/CS and WBS elements
  • Cut-over: how open purchase orders, sales orders, production orders and inventory values migrate with their Finance values intact
General Ledger and ledgers (FI-GL)

The Universal Journal is one table; the ledgers on top of it decide what each stakeholder sees. Parallel accounting for IFRS and local GAAP, the leading and non-leading ledgers, extension ledgers, and the currencies and fiscal year variants each ledger carries.

What I check

  • Leading and non-leading ledgers, extension ledgers for management adjustments, and the accounting principle each one carries
  • Currency types per ledger and company code, with group and functional currencies where consolidation and reporting need them
  • Fiscal year variants, posting periods and the close steps that depend on them: foreign currency valuation, reclassification, accruals
  • Open item management, clearing and the period-end sequence, so the close is a schedule rather than a search
Document splitting and Profit Center Accounting

Document splitting is what makes a balance sheet by profit center or segment possible, and it is close to impossible to change after go-live. The characteristics, the zero-balance rules and the profit center derivation decide whether segment reporting is real or a reconciliation exercise every month.

What I check

  • Splitting characteristics, with the zero-balance and mandatory settings per characteristic
  • Item categories, business transaction variants and constants for the document types that carry the split: invoices, payments, clearings
  • Profit center derivation from material, cost object, sales order and asset, with the defaults and substitutions that catch the rest
  • Migration of open items with document splitting active, so the first balance sheet by segment reconciles
Margin Analysis (CO-PA)

Margin Analysis lives in the Universal Journal, so the design is about which characteristics and derivations exist and how cost reaches the margin. The question is whether margin reporting matches how the business sells and steers: by customer, product, channel, region or project.

What I check

  • Operating concern, characteristics and derivation rules from the customer master, the material master and the sales order
  • Cost of goods sold split by cost component, and the attribution of price differences and production variances to the margin
  • How overhead reaches the margin: top-down distribution, assessment to profitability segments, and the realignment strategy
  • Account-based Margin Analysis as the basis, and what, if anything, still needs costing-based CO-PA next to it
Product Costing and Material Ledger (CO-PC)

Standard costs set inventory values and the margin; actual costing decides whether the P&L shows what production really cost. Costing variants, the cost component structure and the Material Ledger are where manufacturers find the surprises at the first close.

What I check

  • Costing variants, valuation variants, the costing sheet for overhead and the cost component structure
  • Price control per material type, Material Ledger activation and the actual costing run
  • Work in process, variance categories and settlement of production and process orders
  • Co-products, by-products, subcontracting and intercompany stock transfers, including group valuation and transfer prices where they apply
Overhead Controlling and allocations (CO-OM, PaPM)

Cost centers, internal orders and the allocation cycles that move cost to where the business wants to see it. When allocations get complex, SAP Profitability and Performance Management (PaPM) takes over, and the design has to say what runs where and how the two reconcile.

What I check

  • Cost center standard hierarchy, cost center categories, activity types and the planning approach
  • Assessment, distribution and activity allocation cycles, sender and receiver rules, and their run order in the close
  • Internal orders and statistical orders, settlement rules and receivers
  • Which allocations run in universal allocation and which in PaPM, with the reconciliation between them
Asset Accounting (FI-AA) and Investment Management

Asset Accounting posts per ledger, so depreciation areas must line up with the accounting principles. Capitalisation rules, assets under construction, investment orders and projects decide how CAPEX reaches the balance sheet and how it is reported before it does.

What I check

  • Chart of depreciation, depreciation areas per ledger and accounting principle, and the posting of parallel valuations
  • Asset classes, account determination, capitalisation thresholds and low-value asset rules per country
  • Assets under construction, investment orders and WBS elements with settlement to fixed assets
  • Investment programs and budgeting where Investment Management is in scope, and intercompany asset transfers
Intercompany billing, reconciliation (ICMR) and group reporting

Intercompany is where most closes lose days. The value flows between company codes, intercompany billing, matching and reconciliation, and the feed to group consolidation decide whether the group close is a process or a rescue.

What I check

  • Intercompany scope: stock transfers, drop shipments, services, cost and asset transfers, with pricing and tax treatment per flow
  • Intercompany billing and the partner assignment on every intercompany posting, so eliminations work
  • Matching and reconciliation (ICMR) rules, matching methods and the reconciliation calendar inside the close
  • The feed to SAP Group Reporting or the consolidation system: financial statement items, consolidation units and the mapping

What clients say

I have hired Uğur as S/4HANA expert on our migration project for the Corporate SAP environment. Together with our business and IT architects, he worked on the projects pre-study and detailed out the as-is and to-be situations. Together with his Air France colleague Uğur was responsible for leading the RFI process for our integrator selection.

Richard van der Laan, Group Controller Maintenance and Program Director SAP MRO, Air France-KLM

As finance lead Ugur was responsible for the entire lifecycle of our project. One of the strengths of Ugur is his tenacity to look further than just finance but also helps in the integration between processes. I would recommend him any time without any hesitation.

Martijn Van Giessel, Director Food & Agro, Industry & Services

Ugur's help as an SAP S/4HANA expert has been incredibly valuable for our organisation in many different aspects. We worked very closely coauthoring a white paper about Best Practices for Transitions to SAP S/4HANA, where the knowledge he provided from several global S/4HANA implementation projects, added the credibility and subject matter expertise that we needed.

Jorge Ruiz, Product Marketing, Winshuttle

Find out where your Finance design stands

The free assessment takes about 15 minutes and ranks your risks on the spot. If the result worries you, we talk.